- GCN Circular #9835
J. R. Cummings (NASA/GSFC/CRESST) on behalf of the
Swift-BAT team,
S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, E. Mazets, V. Pal'shin,
D. Frederiks, and T. Cline on behalf of the Konus-Wind team,
M. Marisaldi, F. Fuschino, C. Labanti, M. Galli,
G. Di Cocco on behalf of the AGILE team,
K. Yamaoka, M. Ohno, Y. Fukazawa, T. Takahashi, M. Tashiro,
Y. Terada, T. Murakami, K. Makishima, and Y. Hanabata on
behalf of the Suzaku-WAM team,
and K. Hurley for the IPN
At 16:11:12 on 2009-08-23, GRB 090823 triggered the
Suzaku WAM. The IPN was notified, and the burst was
also observed by KONUS-Wind, Agile-MCAL, and (during a
slew maneuver) Swift-BAT. A source was found in ground
analysis of BAT event data, which is routinely collected
during many pre-planned slews, and the source location
was confirmed by IPN triangulation.
The BAT position is RA, Dec 228.711, 60.660 which is
equivalent to
RA, Dec (J2000): 15:14:50.6, 60d 39' 36"
with an uncertainty radius of 4 arcmin (estimated 90%
containment, stat+sys).
We have triangulated GRB 090823 to a Konus-WAM annulus
centered at RA(2000)=3D141.472 (09h 25m 53s)
Dec(2000)=3D+9.275 (+9d 16' 31"), whose radius is
52.640 =B1 4.346 deg (3 sigma). The BAT source is
0.384 deg (0.27 sigma) from the center line of the
annulus.
As observed in Suzaku-WAM and Agile-MCAL, the burst had
two peaks at about T+1 and T+4 seconds, and had emission
above 700 keV but not above 1.4 MeV. The BAT lightcurve
shows that the emission began with a slow rise beginning
about T-3 seconds, and decayed back to background rates
by about T+20 seconds. The BAT event data, from which
mask-weighted spectra and images are constructed, began
at about T+10.5 seconds, missing 99% of the burst.
A Swift Target of Opportunity has been requested and
approved to follow up this burst with the Swift XRT and
UVOT about 32 hours after the burst.
- GCN Circular #9836
S. Golenetskii, R.Aptekar, D. Frederiks, E. Mazets, V. Pal'shin,
P. Oleynik, M. Ulanov, D. Svinkin, and T. Cline
on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report:
The long GRB 090823 (Cummings et al., GCN 9835)
triggered Konus-Wind at T0=58270.606 s UT (16:11:10.606)
This burst was also observed by the Suzaku WAM, Agile-MCAL, and
(during a slew maneuver) Swift-BAT.
The burst had a smooth structure with a duration of ~10 s.
The Konus-Wind light curves of this GRB are available at
http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB090823_T58270/
As observed by Konus-Wind the burst had
a fluence of 8.9(-0.3,+0.5)x10-6 erg/cm2, and
a 256-ms peak flux, measured from T0+3.072,
of 2.8(-0.25,+0.25)x10-6 erg/cm2/s
(both in the 20 keV - 2 MeV energy range).
The time-integrated spectrum of the burst (from T0 to T0+14.848 s)
is well fitted (in the 20 keV - 2 MeV range)
by a power law with exponential cutoff model:
dN/dE ~ (E^alpha)*exp(-E*(2+alpha)/Ep)
with Alpha = -0.49(-0.15,+0.17),
and Ep = 188(-15,+18)keV (chi2 = 56/61 dof).
Fitting by the GRB (Band) model yields to the same Alpha and Ep
values with the high energy photon index Beta of -7 (< -2.7)
The spectrum at the maximum count rate, measured from
T0 + 0.256s to T0 + 6.656s, is well fitted (in the 20 keV - 2 MeV range)
by the GRB (Band) model with:
Alpha = -0.45(-0.14,+0.16),
Beta = -3.0(-2.2,+0.4), and
Ep = 182(-18,+18)keV (chi2 = 63/60 dof).
All the quoted values are preliminary.
All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level.
- GCN Circular #9838
J. R. Cummings (NASA/GSFC/CRESST)
Due to a typographical error, the RA of the source quoted
for GRB 090823 in GCN #9835 was incorrect by a large
amount. The correct BAT position was 128.711, 60.660 which
is equivalent to
RA, Dec (J2000): 8:34:50.7, 60d 39' 36"
with an uncertainty radius of 4 arcmin (estimated 90%
containment, stat+sys).
I apologize for the error.
- GCN Circular #9839
A. Copete, J. Grindlay (Harvard)
S. Barthelmy, C. Markwardt, N. Gehrels (NASA/GSFC)
We hereby report confirmation of the Swift-BAT position of GRB 090823
reported by Cummings et al. (GCN 9835, 9838), from an independent
analysis of the BAT event-mode data done by the BAT Slew Survey
(BATSS), in the slew that started at 16:10:02 UT and lasted 178 sec.
The BATSS-calculated position is RA, Dec = 128.671, +60.641 deg, which
is:
RA (J2000) = 08h 34m 41s
Dec(J2000) = +60d 38' 29"
with an uncertainty of 4.51 arcmin (90% confidence, including
systematics). The burst was detected with a significance of 6.2 sigma
and 6.7 sigma from imaging in the 15-50 keV and 15-150 keV energy
bands, respectively. Consistent with the report in GCN 9835, the
lightcurve in the slew data only spans a 15-sec trailing edge of the
prompt emission of the burst before it fades into the background.
- GCN Circular #9840
D. Grupe (PSU), E. Hoversten (PSU) and Jay Cummings (NASA/GSFC)
report on behalf of the Swift team:
We have analysed the XRT and UVOT data of the IPN burst GRB090823
(Cummings et al. GCN Circ. 9835), beginning on 2009-08-24 at
22:17, 30 hours after the Suzaku WAM trigger. The data contain 4.7
ks in XRT photon counting mode. We clearly detect a possible X-ray
afterglow within the 4' BAT error circle given by Cummings and Copete
et al. (GCN circs. 9838 and 9839, respectively) at
RA-2000,Dec-2000=128.67676, +60.65169 which corresponds to
RA-2000 = 08h 34m 42.42s
Dec-2000 = +60d 39' 06.1"
with an uncertainty of 5.5"
During the 4.7 ks observation on 2009-08-24 the X-ray source had a
count rate of (5.7+/-1.1)e-3 counts s-1 in the XRT which converts
to an observed flux in the 0.3-10 keV band of (2.9+/-0.5)e-13
ergs s-1 cm-2 assuming a typical GRB afterglow spectrum.
The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB 090823
108380 s after the BAT trigger (Cummings, et al., GCN Circ. 9835).
No optical afterglow consistent with the XRT position
is detected in the initial UVOT exposures.
Preliminary 3-sigma upper limits using the UVOT photometric system
(Poole et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 627) for the initial exposures are:
Filter T_start(s) T_stop(s) Exp(s) Mag
white 109194 115699 1464 >21.8
v 110009 116640 1680 >20.1
u 108380 114954 1597 >20.7
The values quoted above are not corrected for the Galactic extinction
due to the reddening of E(B-V) = 0.06 in the direction of the burst
(Schlegel et al. 1998).
Swift is planning to re-observe the field of GRB 090823 on
2009-08-27 for 10 ks in order to see if the X-ray source has faded.
This circular is an official product of the Swift team.
- GCN Circular #9902
D. Grupe (PSU) reports on behalf of the Swift XRT team:
Swift has observed the field of IPN burst GRB090823 (Cummings et
al. GCN Circ. 9835) twice after the initial 4.7 ks observation
on 2009-08-24 (Grupe et al., GCN Circ. 9840) for 9.5 ks on
2009-08-27 and 7.5 ks on 2009-09-05. During the 2009-08-27
observation the X-ray source was clearly detected again at a level
of (2.3+/-0.6)e-3 counts s-1 (about 1.1e-13 ergs s-1 cm-2), roughly
half of the flux during the first observation. During the
2009-09-05 observation however, the X-ray source is definitely
gone and we can only derive a 3-sigma upper limit at a level of
1.9e-3 counts s-1 (9.4e-14 ergs s-1 cm-2). We can confirm that the
source listed in GCN circ. 9840 is the X-ray afterglow of
GRB 090823.
- GCN Report 241.1
GCN_Report 241.1 has been posted:
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/reports/report_241_1.pdf
by D. Grupe
at PSU
titled: "Final Results on Swift GRB 090823"